kasa_balavu
Yaqona Dina
Tudei kava is only grown in Vanuatu, Papua New Guinea, and USA (small quantities of Isa). Fiji doesn't produce enough kava to meet local demand, so imports huge quantities of kava from Vanuatu. A lot of this is Tudei, and some of it is re-exported. For that reason, unless proven otherwise via consistent acetone testing (TK certification), you should assume that all kava from Fiji (and all the above countries) is tainted with Tudei.Is the tudei corruption of good root, more of a Vanuatu thing? As in, is there more noble root grown, and not cut/tainted with tudei, in Fiji and Tonga?
Kava arrived in the Solomon Islands from Vanuatu after WWII. I don't know which cultivars were introduced, but you can assume that there is no difference between Vanuatu and Solomon Island kava... there simply hasn't been enough time for natural selection to have changed the cultivars in any significant way. While there has been no official studies of their kava recently, I think it's safe to assume that it is nobel. I recommend having it tested anyway.
That leaves out Tongan and Samoan kava. If you can verify that the kava you purchased came from those countries, it's probably nobel.
I've worked on these farms, own one (not currently producing kava), and have family and many friends still toiling in those very same Pacific Island small-holder farms. I've also managed a middleman/exporter business (of taro, a crop commonly interplanted with kava in Fiji). I can categorically state that this isn't a problem that couldn't be solved within a few months if the exporters had the will to do so.I guess the big difference here is that I come from a sociological and agribusiness background. I know what farms in the tropics look like. I know what the logistics of food production look like in Pacific Island nations. Getting a bag of Kava somewhere in the midwest of the US and doing a test is far removed from the process of piling dried Kava root and preparing it for export to a capital city from a remote island, and finally to a port somewhere in the US.
If you ask the big exporters, they will tell you just that. There is no incentive for them to stop buying and exporting tudei kava, and that is the only reason it's on the market.
It's always nice for consumers to have choice. I like choice. But if you care about kava, then you need to put the health of the kava industry ahead of customer choice in this instance. So many people in villages across the Pacific depend on kava to make a living, to put food on the table and to send their kids to school. We must take EVERY PRECAUTION to ensure that the kava market isn't ruined again like it was 13 years ago by the European ban. Your (yes I'm taking this personal, I know) heart seems to be in the right place; you've travelled all the way to Africa to do humanitarian work. You've travelled in the Pacific and know the plight of the people out in the villages. These people deserve better.I think people should be able to decide for themselves. If they have a choice between Kava that is labeled Noble and Kava that is labeled Tudei or non-Noble, then they should be able to make that decision.
Every time you advocate for Tudei kava in the name of "consumer choice", you're not just idly standing by and letting the market decide, you're actually increasing the chance that a whole lot of kids in Vanuatu, in Fiji, and in Tonga aren't going to be able to go to school.
Tudei kava is considered horrible stuff in Fiji. Nobody will drink it intentionally here. People who've been drinking kava their whole lives are sickened by it.
The more adverse affects reports are made in the western world, the worse kava is going to look. The more tudei is on the market, the more adverse affects reports there are going to be. It's simple arithmetic.
The stakes are high, and in the face of that, advocating on the basis of "consumer choice" is ridiculous.
No vendor is going to go out of business because of this unless they refuse to sell nobel kava. If one fears so, let him/her come forward and let us know, I for one might be able to help them out.(directed at @Deleted User) The unintended (or intended) consequences of your ideological push range from putting certain vendors out of business
Last edited: